Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments

Background: The empowerment of pregnant women is a meaningful strategy that profoundly impacts the health of women and their children. Despite a significant increase in the empowerment of pregnant women and its measurement, little attention was given to a consensus on the selection and application o...

詳細記述

保存先:
書誌詳細
主要な著者: Liu, Yanjia, Che, Chong Chin, Hamdan, Mukhri, Chong, Mei Chan
フォーマット: 論文
出版事項: Elsevier 2024
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:http://eprints.um.edu.my/46969/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104002
タグ: タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
id my.um.eprints.46969
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.469692025-01-09T04:07:18Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/46969/ Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments Liu, Yanjia Che, Chong Chin Hamdan, Mukhri Chong, Mei Chan RG Gynecology and obstetrics RT Nursing Background: The empowerment of pregnant women is a meaningful strategy that profoundly impacts the health of women and their children. Despite a significant increase in the empowerment of pregnant women and its measurement, little attention was given to a consensus on the selection and application of assessment instruments used for pregnant women. Objective: To identify the available assessment instruments for measuring the empowerment of pregnant women and to describe the appraisal content and their psychometric properties. Methods: We searched nine bibliographic databases for original studies that focus on the measurement of empowerment in pregnant women. Arksey and O'Malley's methodology and PRISMA-ScR were selected to guide the implementation of this scoping review. The COSMIN criteria was employed to assess the methodological quality and the quality of psychometric properties. Results: A total of 23 studies were included and 13 instruments were extracted. Given comprehensive considerations, Kameda's prenatal empowerment scale may be deemed suitable. The included instruments comprehensively measured the attributes of empowerment, with a particular focus on facilitating women's choice and decision-making. Except for the four most recent self-designed questionnaires, the remaining instruments had been tested for reliability and/or validity. Conclusion: There were heterogeneous results regarding the included instruments' appraisal content and psychometric properties. Future studies focusing on the development or validation of measurement instruments should be guided by influential and identical standards. Elsevier 2024-07 Article PeerReviewed Liu, Yanjia and Che, Chong Chin and Hamdan, Mukhri and Chong, Mei Chan (2024) Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments. Midwifery, 134. p. 104002. ISSN 0266-6138, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104002 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104002>. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104002 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104002
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic RG Gynecology and obstetrics
RT Nursing
spellingShingle RG Gynecology and obstetrics
RT Nursing
Liu, Yanjia
Che, Chong Chin
Hamdan, Mukhri
Chong, Mei Chan
Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments
description Background: The empowerment of pregnant women is a meaningful strategy that profoundly impacts the health of women and their children. Despite a significant increase in the empowerment of pregnant women and its measurement, little attention was given to a consensus on the selection and application of assessment instruments used for pregnant women. Objective: To identify the available assessment instruments for measuring the empowerment of pregnant women and to describe the appraisal content and their psychometric properties. Methods: We searched nine bibliographic databases for original studies that focus on the measurement of empowerment in pregnant women. Arksey and O'Malley's methodology and PRISMA-ScR were selected to guide the implementation of this scoping review. The COSMIN criteria was employed to assess the methodological quality and the quality of psychometric properties. Results: A total of 23 studies were included and 13 instruments were extracted. Given comprehensive considerations, Kameda's prenatal empowerment scale may be deemed suitable. The included instruments comprehensively measured the attributes of empowerment, with a particular focus on facilitating women's choice and decision-making. Except for the four most recent self-designed questionnaires, the remaining instruments had been tested for reliability and/or validity. Conclusion: There were heterogeneous results regarding the included instruments' appraisal content and psychometric properties. Future studies focusing on the development or validation of measurement instruments should be guided by influential and identical standards.
format Article
author Liu, Yanjia
Che, Chong Chin
Hamdan, Mukhri
Chong, Mei Chan
author_facet Liu, Yanjia
Che, Chong Chin
Hamdan, Mukhri
Chong, Mei Chan
author_sort Liu, Yanjia
title Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments
title_short Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments
title_full Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments
title_fullStr Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments
title_full_unstemmed Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments
title_sort measuring empowerment in pregnant women: a scoping review of progress in instruments
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2024
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/46969/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104002
_version_ 1821105746663702528
score 13.252575