Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments
Background: The empowerment of pregnant women is a meaningful strategy that profoundly impacts the health of women and their children. Despite a significant increase in the empowerment of pregnant women and its measurement, little attention was given to a consensus on the selection and application o...
保存先:
主要な著者: | , , , |
---|---|
フォーマット: | 論文 |
出版事項: |
Elsevier
2024
|
主題: | |
オンライン・アクセス: | http://eprints.um.edu.my/46969/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104002 |
タグ: |
タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
|
id |
my.um.eprints.46969 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.um.eprints.469692025-01-09T04:07:18Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/46969/ Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments Liu, Yanjia Che, Chong Chin Hamdan, Mukhri Chong, Mei Chan RG Gynecology and obstetrics RT Nursing Background: The empowerment of pregnant women is a meaningful strategy that profoundly impacts the health of women and their children. Despite a significant increase in the empowerment of pregnant women and its measurement, little attention was given to a consensus on the selection and application of assessment instruments used for pregnant women. Objective: To identify the available assessment instruments for measuring the empowerment of pregnant women and to describe the appraisal content and their psychometric properties. Methods: We searched nine bibliographic databases for original studies that focus on the measurement of empowerment in pregnant women. Arksey and O'Malley's methodology and PRISMA-ScR were selected to guide the implementation of this scoping review. The COSMIN criteria was employed to assess the methodological quality and the quality of psychometric properties. Results: A total of 23 studies were included and 13 instruments were extracted. Given comprehensive considerations, Kameda's prenatal empowerment scale may be deemed suitable. The included instruments comprehensively measured the attributes of empowerment, with a particular focus on facilitating women's choice and decision-making. Except for the four most recent self-designed questionnaires, the remaining instruments had been tested for reliability and/or validity. Conclusion: There were heterogeneous results regarding the included instruments' appraisal content and psychometric properties. Future studies focusing on the development or validation of measurement instruments should be guided by influential and identical standards. Elsevier 2024-07 Article PeerReviewed Liu, Yanjia and Che, Chong Chin and Hamdan, Mukhri and Chong, Mei Chan (2024) Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments. Midwifery, 134. p. 104002. ISSN 0266-6138, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104002 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104002>. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104002 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104002 |
institution |
Universiti Malaya |
building |
UM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Malaya |
content_source |
UM Research Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/ |
topic |
RG Gynecology and obstetrics RT Nursing |
spellingShingle |
RG Gynecology and obstetrics RT Nursing Liu, Yanjia Che, Chong Chin Hamdan, Mukhri Chong, Mei Chan Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments |
description |
Background: The empowerment of pregnant women is a meaningful strategy that profoundly impacts the health of women and their children. Despite a significant increase in the empowerment of pregnant women and its measurement, little attention was given to a consensus on the selection and application of assessment instruments used for pregnant women. Objective: To identify the available assessment instruments for measuring the empowerment of pregnant women and to describe the appraisal content and their psychometric properties. Methods: We searched nine bibliographic databases for original studies that focus on the measurement of empowerment in pregnant women. Arksey and O'Malley's methodology and PRISMA-ScR were selected to guide the implementation of this scoping review. The COSMIN criteria was employed to assess the methodological quality and the quality of psychometric properties. Results: A total of 23 studies were included and 13 instruments were extracted. Given comprehensive considerations, Kameda's prenatal empowerment scale may be deemed suitable. The included instruments comprehensively measured the attributes of empowerment, with a particular focus on facilitating women's choice and decision-making. Except for the four most recent self-designed questionnaires, the remaining instruments had been tested for reliability and/or validity. Conclusion: There were heterogeneous results regarding the included instruments' appraisal content and psychometric properties. Future studies focusing on the development or validation of measurement instruments should be guided by influential and identical standards. |
format |
Article |
author |
Liu, Yanjia Che, Chong Chin Hamdan, Mukhri Chong, Mei Chan |
author_facet |
Liu, Yanjia Che, Chong Chin Hamdan, Mukhri Chong, Mei Chan |
author_sort |
Liu, Yanjia |
title |
Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments |
title_short |
Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments |
title_full |
Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments |
title_fullStr |
Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: A scoping review of progress in instruments |
title_sort |
measuring empowerment in pregnant women: a scoping review of progress in instruments |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/46969/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104002 |
_version_ |
1821105746663702528 |
score |
13.252575 |