Gender Boardroom Quotas: A Survey of Malaysian Corporate Directors
A number of countries have introduced gender boardroom quotas by which firms are required to appoint at least a certain number or proportion of women to their boards. Subsequently, the government of Malaysia, in 2011, introduced the policy of having at least 30 percent women on corporate boards. T...
保存先:
主要な著者: | , , , |
---|---|
フォーマット: | 論文 |
出版事項: |
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS)
2019
|
主題: | |
オンライン・アクセス: | http://library.oum.edu.my/repository/1203/1/624-gender-boardroom-quotas-a-survey-of-malaysian-corporate-directors http://www.ijbs.unimas.my/index.php http://library.oum.edu.my/repository/1203/ |
タグ: |
タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
|
要約: | A number of countries have introduced gender boardroom quotas by which firms are required to appoint at
least a certain number or proportion of women to their boards. Subsequently, the government of Malaysia, in
2011, introduced the policy of having at least 30 percent women on corporate boards. This study seeks the
opinion of corporate directors on whether they are supportive of the policy. In addition, we examine if the
characteristics of the respondents influence their opinion. A questionnaire survey was conducted on a sample
of 84 directors who sit on the boards of listed companies in Malaysia. A majority of the respondents believe
that there should not be any quota for both genders. Some of the respondents comment that it is not gender
that matters; what is more important is the quality of individuals who sit on the board. We find that women
are indifferent, while a majority of the men do not agree with the policy. In addition, directors who have a
family relationship with any other directors tend not to favour the policy, compared to those who do not have
any family relationship. We also find that a majority of the respondents do not agree that women directors
could enhance firm financial performance and social responsibility activities; neither do a majority of them
agree that women could curb unethical conducts. This study is important to the policymakers in that the results
provide insights on the issue of whether the 30 percent quota is necessary. (Abstract by authors) |
---|